Antivirus, Chromebook, Internet Security

Do I need an antivirus for my Chromebook?

If you are a proud owner of a Chromebook or are in the hunt of buying one, you might have…

If you are a proud owner of a Chromebook or are in the hunt of buying one, you might have heard some praising reviews of how well it is optimized for the internet. The Chromebook runs on a Linux-based operating system called the Chrome OS.

While the system software is relatively new, rumours about its security have already surfaced on the internet that were enough to create panic and confusion amongst its users. So, since the question of whether Chromebooks need an antivirus or not, still remains unanswered for many, we would like to keep the answer short an simple – NO, you do not need an antivirus for Chromebook.

In reality, you would actually have a hard time finding one anywhere and if you do, it probably is just generic security software. As a matter of fact, this is one of the biggest reasons, coupled with its price why many choose the Chromebook over a Windows based laptop.

Why doesn’t the Chromebook need any security?

The Chromebook was designed specifically for having a better browsing and internet experience, predominantly utilizing the Google Chrome browser. In order to achieve that, one of the most vital factors Google had to look into, was protecting it from malware and other malignant threats.

While Google Chrome itself is a genuinely secure and stable browser on all platforms, the tech giant took an extra step in ensuring it was designed to safeguard itself properly from any exploitation. One of the ways Google was able to achieve that, was by adding a security feature called process isolation. It works something like this. A cyber attacker tries to exploit a device through a web page the user is visiting.

Once he is successful, he can jump and access an adjacent tab where there might be some sensitive data to capitalize on. With process isolation, even if one tab somehow gets compromised, it wouldn’t be possible to latch on the next, making it impossible to see anything else on the computer.

If however, cyber criminals do find an exploit in the future, how is it going to affect the Chromebook?

As of now, Chrome OS is protected from viruses, trojans, malware and ransomware. If however, in the future, a loophole is found there is less of a worry than if the same would have happened on a PC or a Mac. The reason is obvious – all your files and important data are always automatically backed up to the cloud. Unless there is someone who can exploit that, you can be assured your data is well secured.

Even if a Chromebook, somehow in the future does get infected by a virus, all you would have to do is reset it back to its factory settings and recover all your data through the cloud.

I feel there is something wrong with my Chromebook. Can I be assured it is not a virus?

No matter how safe and secure Chromebooks happen to be, it wouldn’t be right to part ways with caution so early. It is apparently next to impossible that your device could be affected by a virus. If you feel your Chromebook is acting strange, it is possibly due to one of the following 2 reasons:

  1. Malicious Extensions:
    Though very rare, if however, your Chromebook starts to behave unusually, its likely that it has been targeted by a malicious Google Chrome browser extension. Even though extensions are seriously monitored for suspicious behavior, it is advisable not to install one if you are not familiar with the source.

    In fact, before installing, you should check what permissions and rights the extension requires. If somehow you feel that an extension is responsible for your Chromebook’s strange behavior, all you have to do is turn off extension syncing in the settings and reset your Chromebook.

  2. Browser Hijack:
    Browser Hijack is rather a cunning scam where fraudsters try to gain control over the browser you are using by locking it. They then convince you to pay in order to continue using it. If this or something similar ever happens to you, remember one thing – DO NOT PAY ANYTHING!

    Google doesn’t charge its users for access to the browser. If by some means you enter a website that tries to hijack your browser, all that is required is resetting your device. However, keep in mind not to restore Google Chrome to its previous configuration when launching it again.

Does that mean apart from couple of potential minor threats my Chromebook is well secured?

Although we believe you don’t need antivirus for Chromebook, We did mention it is still too early to part ways with caution, didn’t we? Well, we haven’t finished saying that yet. Just because your Chromebook cannot be infected by a virus, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t take precautions against having your data stolen. There are scammers and hackers all around the internet looking to trap naive users.

Spam emails are the biggest security concerns we haven’t still been able to defeat, the most common being phishing emails. The idea is really simple. Cyber culprits design a clone copy of a popular website convincing you to believe that nothing wrong is happening while you enter your username and password to register or log in. Once you click the ‘login’ or ‘sign up’ button, we have a rewarded culprit and an oblivious victim.

The information you entered thinking you are signing up or logging in are now in the hands of someone you would not want it to be. One of the most common tasks users perform on the internet is online banking and shopping. If you have extensions installed and are worried that one or more of them might be devious, carry out such operations in incognito mode. This may be helpful as it disables all extensions by default. For more information on what to look out for see our article – What internet security threats to look out for in 2018?

Keep your passwords strong, use a password manager and never click on emails that look spam or are not familiar to you. Your computer is already a profoundly sophisticated machine when it comes to stability and security. All that is required is a little common sense and precaution while operating it; as the biggest security worries of today are not the computer, but the user itself.

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Internet Security

Protests in Delhi a security challenge

Sit-ins and protests in and around the national capital are emerging as a big security challenge for the establishment. According to Delhi Police’s 2022 report, cops handled 6,277 law and order situations relating to protests, demonstrations, meetings and processions, with latest curbs being enforced due to the ongoing farmers’ protest around Delhi-NCR.A former Delhi police

Sit-ins and protests in and around the national capital are emerging as a big security challenge for the establishment. According to Delhi Police’s 2022 report, cops handled 6,277 law and order situations relating to protests, demonstrations, meetings and processions, with latest curbs being enforced due to the ongoing farmers’ protest around Delhi-NCR.A former Delhi police commissioner told ET: “Crowd management has become complex these days mainly due to social media…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

3 Protocols Expanding Bitcoin Network Into NFT, DeFi, and Tooling

Binance’s report identifies three protocols, bitSmiley, Liquidium, and Portal, that could expand Bitcoin’s reach into DeFi, NFTs and tooling sectors, potentially enhancing scalability and security. The post 3 Protocols Expanding Bitcoin Network Into NFT, DeFi, and Tooling appeared first on BeInCrypto…

Binance’s report identifies three protocols, bitSmiley, Liquidium, and Portal, that could expand Bitcoin’s reach into DeFi, NFTs and tooling sectors, potentially enhancing scalability and security.
The post 3 Protocols Expanding Bitcoin Network Into NFT, DeFi, and Tooling appeared first on BeInCrypto…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Congress seeks clarification from Yellen on crypto oversight plans, criticizes Howey Test

Share this article URL Copied Members of the US Congress have posed a list of questions in a recent letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in response to her call for enhanced oversight of crypto. Notably, they highlighted the limitations of the Howey Test in protecting consumers in the crypto market. The letter, signed by

Share this article

Members of the US Congress have posed a list of questions in a recent letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in response to her call for enhanced oversight of crypto. Notably, they highlighted the limitations of the Howey Test in protecting consumers in the crypto market.

The letter, signed by House Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick McHenry, House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson, Rep. French Hill, and Rep. Dusty Johnson, seeks Yellen’s detailed explanation of how the regulatory framework should be shaped concerning digital assets, following her call earlier today.

Congress has requested clarification on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) role. Notably, they have raised concerns about the effectiveness of the Howey Test, which is used to determine the classification of a transaction as an investment contract and, thus, a security. Congress is questioning whether the Howey Test is sufficient for providing adequate consumer protection.

The legislators have argued that the SEC’s retrospective application of the test does little to protect investors, stating:

“Chair Gensler has declared that “the vast majority of crypto tokens likely meet the investment contract test.” However, the final investment contract analysis is backwards looking, made by a court after the transaction in question has been completed. How does this reactive legal authority provide adequate protection for customers, in the absence of comprehensive legislation?”

Congress has also highlighted that the current regulatory framework does not cover a significant portion of the crypto-asset ecosystem, including Bitcoin and Ether. They have asked the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) whether these cryptocurrencies are considered securities. Led by Yellen, the FSOC brings together key financial regulators to monitor potential risks and safeguard the financial system.

Furthermore, Congressmen have expressed concern about regulatory gaps in spot markets for digital assets that are not considered securities. They are questioning if the Commodity Futures Trading Commission should expand its jurisdiction to include these spot markets, given its existing authority over certain aspects of non-security digital asset transactions. Congress expects to receive answers from Yellen by February 20.

Yellen has been actively advocating for stricter regulations after FTX’s collapse. In a testimony before the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday, she warned of the risks associated with crypto platforms and stablecoins, urging Congress to enact stricter regulations for the crypto industry.

Share this article

Share this article

Members of the US Congress have posed a list of questions in a recent letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in response to her call for enhanced oversight of crypto. Notably, they highlighted the limitations of the Howey Test in protecting consumers in the crypto market.

The letter, signed by House Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick McHenry, House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson, Rep. French Hill, and Rep. Dusty Johnson, seeks Yellen’s detailed explanation of how the regulatory framework should be shaped concerning digital assets, following her call earlier today.

Congress has requested clarification on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) role. Notably, they have raised concerns about the effectiveness of the Howey Test, which is used to determine the classification of a transaction as an investment contract and, thus, a security. Congress is questioning whether the Howey Test is sufficient for providing adequate consumer protection.

The legislators have argued that the SEC’s retrospective application of the test does little to protect investors, stating:

“Chair Gensler has declared that “the vast majority of crypto tokens likely meet the investment contract test.” However, the final investment contract analysis is backwards looking, made by a court after the transaction in question has been completed. How does this reactive legal authority provide adequate protection for customers, in the absence of comprehensive legislation?”

Congress has also highlighted that the current regulatory framework does not cover a significant portion of the crypto-asset ecosystem, including Bitcoin and Ether. They have asked the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) whether these cryptocurrencies are considered securities. Led by Yellen, the FSOC brings together key financial regulators to monitor potential risks and safeguard the financial system.

Furthermore, Congressmen have expressed concern about regulatory gaps in spot markets for digital assets that are not considered securities. They are questioning if the Commodity Futures Trading Commission should expand its jurisdiction to include these spot markets, given its existing authority over certain aspects of non-security digital asset transactions. Congress expects to receive answers from Yellen by February 20.

Yellen has been actively advocating for stricter regulations after FTX’s collapse. In a testimony before the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday, she warned of the risks associated with crypto platforms and stablecoins, urging Congress to enact stricter regulations for the crypto industry.

Share this article

Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Singaporean, 16, under ISA restriction order after being radicalised by far-right extremist ideology

Advertisement Singapore Singaporean teen who identified as white supremacist placed under ISA restrictions for far-right extremism The teenager strongly identified as a white supremacist and aspired to conduct attacks overseas, says the Internal Security Department. File photo of a person using a laptop. (File photo: iStock/Chainarong Prasertthai) New: You can now listen to articles. Sorry

Advertisement

Singapore

Singaporean teen who identified as white supremacist placed under ISA restrictions for far-right extremism

The teenager strongly identified as a white supremacist and aspired to conduct attacks overseas, says the Internal Security Department.

Singaporean teen who identified as white supremacist placed under ISA restrictions for far-right extremism

File photo of a person using a laptop. (File photo: iStock/Chainarong Prasertthai)


New: You can now listen to articles.



Sorry, the audio is unavailable right now.


Please try again later.

This audio is AI-generated.

  • The student is the second Singaporean to be dealt with under the Internal Security Act for being radicalised by far-right extremist ideologies
  • He was exposed to violent extremist material online in 2022 and developed an intense hatred of communities typically targeted by far-right extremists, including African Americans, Arabs and LGBTQ individuals
  • Although he hoped to be recruited for violent attacks overseas, the student did not take steps to actualise his aspirations beyond searching online for weapons

Firdaus Hamzah

Firdaus Hamzah

Firdaus Hamzah

24 Jan 2024 02:00PM
(Updated: 25 Jan 2024 09:42AM)



Bookmark



Bookmark



Share

SINGAPORE: A 16-year-old Singaporean student who was self-radicalised by far-right extremist ideologies has been issued a restriction order under the Internal Security Act (ISA).

The teenager, who is of Chinese ethnicity, identified as a white supremacist and aspired to conduct attacks overseas, the Internal Security Department (ISD) said on Wednesday (Jan 24).

“However, beyond online searches for weapons, he did not take steps to actualise his attack aspirations as he lacked the financial resources and know-how to do so,” ISD said.

It added that he had no plans to conduct any attacks in Singapore.

The student, who was not named, was in Secondary 4 when he was placed under a restriction order in November 2023. This means he is not allowed to travel out of Singapore, access the internet or social media without the approval of the ISD director, among other restrictions.

He is the second Singaporean to be dealt with under the ISA for being radicalised by far-right extremist ideologies.

The first – a 16-year-old Protestant Christian of Indian ethnicity – was detained in December 2020 after planning to attack two mosques in the Woodlands area.

Authorities said at the time that he had made “detailed plans and preparations to conduct terrorist attacks” against Muslims, and that he was influenced by the manifesto of Brenton Tarrant – the man who attacked mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand.

The youth has since been released from detention, ISD said on Wednesday, adding that he had made “good progress” in his rehabilitation and is assessed to no longer pose an imminent security threat.

SELF-RADICALISATION PROCESS

Providing details of the latest case, ISD said the teenager was exposed to violent extremist material online in 2022, after chancing upon videos by American far-right personality Paul Nicholas Miller.

Miller is known for promoting a race war and espouses white supremacist and neo-Nazi rhetoric. He has been tied to multiple far-right extremist organisations overseas, including the Proud Boys and the Boogaloo movement.

By early 2023, the teenager had developed an intense hatred of communities typically targeted by far-right extremists, including African Americans, Arabs and LGBTQ individuals, said ISD.

“Fuelled by online extremist rhetoric, he came to believe that African Americans were responsible for a significant percentage of crime in the United States, and deserved to ‘die a horrible death’,” it added.

“He also perceived illegal Arab immigrants as having committed violent attacks against white populations in Western countries.”

ISD said the teenager subscribed to the Great Replacement Theory commonly referenced by far-right terrorists like the Christchurch attacker, which propagated the idea that the indigenous white population in Western countries were in danger of being replaced by non-white immigrants. 

“Such ethno-nationalist beliefs convinced him that non-white communities such as African Americans and Arabs should be driven away from white-majority countries,” said ISD. 

“The youth participated in several far-right online chat groups and channels, where he shared violent anti-African American videos, as doing so gave him a sense of belonging to the white supremacist community.” 

When asked how this case came to light, ISD told CNA it was unable to comment due to operational concerns. 

It added that the ISA remains a “relevant and effective legislative tool” that allows for pre-emptive action to be taken to neutralise any security threats, such as in the case of the two youths.

“Regardless of the cause or extremist ideology involved, the authorities will not hesitate to take actions against any Singaporean or person residing in Singapore who supports, engages in, or attempts to engage in, armed violence,” it said. 

Growing concern with youth radicalism, terrorism threat to Singapore remains high: ISD

Terrorist groups increasingly targeting youths, Singapore a ‘prized target’: DPM Wong

ASPIRATIONS TO PARTICIPATE IN ATTACKS

According to the ISD, the teenager had hoped to be recruited for violent attacks by white supremacist groups overseas to “fight for the whites”.

He considered travelling to countries such as France, Italy, the US and Russia to participate in attacks against his “vilified communities”.

“Specifically, he shared his interest to conduct a mass shooting in the US in 10 years’ time in a far-right online chat group,” said the ISD.

The agency added that while he searched online for weapons, he did not take steps to actualise his attack aspirations as he lacked the financial resources and know-how to do so. 

“The youth had no plans to conduct any attacks locally, as he felt that these communities had not caused trouble in Singapore,” said ISD.

“There was no indication that the youth had tried to influence his family or friends with his violent extremist views, nor were they aware of his attack ideations.”

Vital to have a capable and vigilant Internal Security Department to protect Singapore: PM Lee

The road to redemption: How two radica

Read More

Continue Reading